2005 | 2004 | favorites | about | links | upcoming shows | contact



sharpness test - june 4, 2005

I shot these from about 7' (70mm) with my new Canon 20D mounted on a tripod, with the mirror-lock and remote shutter switch, at 400 ISO, in Av.


lens

f/2.8f/3.5f/4.5f/5.6

tamron 28-75 f/2.8


1/1000 1/640 1/400 1/250

canon 24-70 f/2.8L


1/1000 1/640 1/400 1/250

sigma 70-200 f/2.8


1/1000 1/800 1/400 1/320

canon 28-135 f/3.5-5.6 IS


— — 1/400 1/250



sharpness test - may 23, 2005

I read a bunch about the problems with these sharpness tests. Many people think that the tests are flawed because they feign controlled scientific experiment, when, really, there are many variables that are not easy to take into account. For example, many claim that, if you are not shooting the text from a position perfectly perpendicular, you will not receive consistent or effective results. (While I find this hard to believe (as very little "real world" shooting will occur exactly perpendicular from a flat subject), I decided to made one modification to my other experiments.

This time, before taping up the newsprint, I set-up in front of a mirror (from about 8') so that the lens aimed directly into the reflection of the lens. This ensured that the lens was level and square. Then, as always, I shot with mirror lock at 400 ISO, Av.


lens

f/2.8f/4.0
jpgrawjpgraw

tamron 28-75 f/2.8


1/45 1/45 1/20 1/20

canon 24-70 f/2.8L


1/45 1/45 1/20 1/20

sigma 70-200 f/2.8

1/45 1/45 1/20 1/20


And, just to satisfy myself that the controlled tests correlated at all with real world tests, I shot a sunflower in our house. I focused on the left-most petal of the three drooping into the center between 1 and 2 o'clock. 400 ISO; tripod; mirror lock; f/2.8; 1/60; 70mm.

WARNING: the original is 4 MB



lens

originalcrop

tamron 28-75 f/2.8


original crop

canon 24-70 f/2.8L


original crop



focus test - may 22, 2005

I ran another series of tests to try to hone in on the (suspected) focus problem on my 10D. Again, I shot the test page at 45 degress, as outlined in this article and further described here. I shot each of my lenses twice from 28mm (from the right of the target) and from 70mm (from the left of the target). I shot my sigma at 125mm from the left (as it couldn't achieve focus at shorter lengths. The first shot of each pair was after I let the camera achieve focus on its own. The second of each pair was after I moved the focus ring and let it refocus again.

I haven't had time to analyze these results too closely yet, but, from what I can gather, it appears that my 10D consistenly front-focuses somewhere around 1-2 cms.


lens

28mm
auto focus
28mm
re-focus
70mm
auto focus
70mm
re-focus

tamron 28-75 f/2.8


result result result result

canon 24-70 f/2.8L


result result result result

canon 28-135 f/3.5-5.6 IS

result result result result

sigma 70-200 f/2.8

result
auto focus @ 125mm
result
re-focus @ 125mm



>

sharpness test - may 20, 2005

As with the first set of test shots below, I shot these from about 8' (70mm)* with a Canon 10D mounted on a tripod, with the timer, at 400 ISO, in Av. I used the mirror lock function this time, however, which led to sharper images and more (though still not fully) consistent results. Also, I stopped-down to 8.0 rather than 6.7 for the fourth shot on each lens, making each increment a full-stop.


lens

f/2.0f/2.8f/4.0f/5.6f/6.7

tamron 28-75 f/2.8


— 1/1000 1/500 1/250 1/125

canon 24-70 f/2.8L


— 1/1000 1/500 1/250 1/125

sigma 24-70 f/2.8

— 1/750 1/350 1/180 1/90

canon 28-135 f/3.5-5.6 IS

— — 1/180
(f/4.5)
1/180 1/90

sigma 70-200 f/2.8

— 1/750 1/350 1/180 1/90

canon 75-300 f/4-5.6 IS *

— — 1/350 1/180 1/90

canon 35 f/2.0 *

1/2000 1/1000 1/500 1/250 1/125

* except for canon 35mm (shot at 35mm from 4') and canon 75-300 (shot from 75mm, with tripod scooched back a bit)



focus test - may 20, 2005

My sharpness tests led to some very interesting results, some unexpected. In the test below, the Sigma 24-70 performs exceptionally well—better, I'd admit, than even my new L lens (at 1/3 the cost). Then, in test above, it performs exceptionally poorly until f/8. The huge jump in sharpness from 5.6 to 8 can't be explained by stopping-down one stop, especially when compared to the much better results wide-open below. In other words, there's a problem. This is not the sort of inconsistency that should occur in a relatively controlled experiment, with the tripod, body, subject, lighting, etc. identical throughout.

So, I conducted a couple focus tests, as outlined in this article. Shooting with my tamron 28-75 (at 70mm f/2.8) at 45 degrees to the test sheet creates some distrurbing results. As this image demonstrates, the camera is front-focussing — here, somewhere between 1-1.5 cms.


click to enlarge

The next image shot with my 35mm prime (at f/2.0) at 45 degrees also demonstrates (albeit less dramatically) the auto focus problems. This one shows rear-focussing by almost 2 cms.


click to enlarge

Together, these tests suggest that there may be something to the rumored problems with the 10Ds.



sharpness test - may 19, 2005

I shot these from about 8' (70mm)* with a Canon 10D mounted on a tripod, with the timer, at 400 ISO, in Av. I did not, however, use the mirror lock-up function. This contributed to some of the inconsistencies and unexpected results, especially on the lighter lenses (more prone to wobble).


lens

f/2.0f/2.8f/4.0f/5.6f/6.7

tamron 28-75 f/2.8


— 1/500 1/250 1/125 —

canon 24-70 f/2.8L


— 1/500 1/250 1/125 —

sigma 24-70 f/2.8

— 1/500 1/250 1/125 —

canon 28-135 f/3.5-5.6 IS

— — 1/125
(f/4.5)
1/90

sigma 70-200 f/2.8

— 1/250 1/250 1/125 —

canon 75-300 f/4-5.6 IS *

— — 1/250 1/125 —

canon 35 f/2.0 *

1/1000 1/500 1/250 1/125 —

* except for canon 35mm (shot at 35mm from 4') and canon 75-300 (shot from 75mm, with tripod scooched back a bit)